🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.